buddha daily wisdom image

an.10.93 Aṅguttara Nikāya (Numbered Discourses)

Views

I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was staying near Savatthi in Jeta’s Grove, Anathapindika’s monastery. Then Anathapindika the householder left Savatthi in the middle of the day to see the Blessed One, but the thought then occurred to him, “Now is not the right time to see the Blessed One, for he is in seclusion. And it is not the right time to see the monks who are developing their minds [in meditation], for they are in seclusion. What if I were to visit the park of the wanderers of other persuasions?” So he headed to the park of the wanderers of other persuasions.

Now on that occasion the wanderers of other persuasions had come together in a gathering and were sitting, discussing many kinds of bestial topics, making a great noise and racket. They saw Anathapindika the householder coming from afar, and on seeing him, hushed one another: “Be quiet, good sirs. Don’t make any noise. Here comes Anathapindika the householder, a disciple of Gotama the contemplative. He is one of those disciples of Gotama the contemplative, clad in white, who lives in Savatthi. These people are fond of quietude and speak in praise of quietude. Maybe, if he perceives our group as quiet, he will consider it worth his while to come our way.” So the wanderers fell silent.

Then Anathapindika the householder went to where the wanderers of other persuasions were staying. On arrival he greeted them courteously. After an exchange of friendly greetings & courtesies, he sat to one side. As he was sitting there, the wanderers said to him, “Tell us, householder, what views Gotama the contemplative has.”

“Venerable sirs, I don’t know entirely what views the Blessed One has.”

“Well, well. So you don’t know entirely what views Gotama the contemplative has. Then tell us what views the monks have.”

“I don’t even know entirely what views the monks have.”

“So you don’t know entirely what views Gotama the contemplative has or even that the monks have. Then tell us what views you have.”

“It wouldn’t be difficult for me to expound to you what views I have. But please let the venerable ones expound each in line with his position, and then it won’t be difficult for me to expound to you what views I have.”

When this had been said, one of the wanderers said to Anathapindika the householder, ”The cosmos is eternal. Only this is true; anything otherwise is worthless. This is the sort of view I have.”

Another wanderer said to Anathapindika, ”The cosmos is not eternal. Only this is true; anything otherwise is worthless. This is the sort of view I have.”

Another wanderer said, “The cosmos is finite… The cosmos is infinite… The soul & the body are the same… The soul is one thing and the body another… After death a Tathagata exists… After death a Tathagata does not exist… After death a Tathagata both does & does not exist… After death a Tathagata neither does nor does not exist. Only this is true; anything otherwise is worthless. This is the sort of view I have.”

When this had been said, Anathapindika the householder said to the wanderers, “As for the venerable one who says, ‘The cosmos is eternal. Only this is true; anything otherwise is worthless. This is the sort of view I have,’ his view arises from his own inappropriate attention or in dependence on the words of another. Now this view has been brought into being, is fabricated, willed, dependently originated. Whatever has been brought into being, is fabricated, willed, dependently originated, that is inconstant. Whatever is inconstant is stress. This venerable one thus adheres to that very stress, submits himself to that very stress.” (Similarly for the other positions.)

When this had been said, the wanderers said to Anathapindika the householder, “We have each & every one expounded to you in line with our own positions. Now tell us what views you have.”

“Whatever has been brought into being, is fabricated, willed, dependently originated, that is inconstant. Whatever is inconstant is stress. Whatever is stress is not me, is not what I am, is not my self. This is the sort of view I have.”

“So, householder, whatever has been brought into being, is fabricated, willed, dependently originated, that is inconstant. Whatever is inconstant is stress. You thus adhere to that very stress, submit yourself to that very stress.”

“Venerable sirs, whatever has been brought into being, is fabricated, willed, dependently originated, that is inconstant. Whatever is inconstant is stress. Whatever is stress is not me, is not what I am, is not my self. Having seen this well with right discernment as it actually is present, I also discern the higher escape from it as it actually is present.”

When this had been said, the wanderers fell silent, abashed, sitting with their shoulders drooping, their heads down, brooding, at a loss for words. Anathapindika the householder, perceiving that the wanderers were silent, abashed… at a loss for words, got up & went to where the Blessed One was staying. On arrival, having bowed down to the Blessed One, he sat to one side. As he was seated there, he told the Blessed One the entirety of his conversation with the wanderers.

[The Blessed One said:] “Well done, householder. Well done. That is how you should periodically refute those foolish men with the Dhamma.” Then he instructed, urged, roused, and encouraged Anathapindika the householder with a talk on Dhamma. When Anathapindika the householder had been instructed, urged, roused and encouraged by the Blessed One with a talk on Dhamma, he got up from his seat and, having bowed down to the Blessed One, left, keeping the Blessed One on his right side. Not long afterward, the Blessed One addressed the monks: “Monks, even a monk who has long penetrated the Dhamma in this Doctrine and Discipline would do well to refute the wanderers of other persuasions with the Dhamma periodically in just the way Anathapindika the householder has done.”

- Translator: Thanissaro Bhikkhu

- Editor: Gabriel Laera


What Is Your View?

“Well then, since it seems you don’t know all the views of the ascetic Gotama,
tell us, what are the views of the mendicants?”
At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery.
Then the householder Anāthapiṇḍika left Sāvatthī in the middle of the day to see the Buddha.
Then it occurred to him,
“It’s the wrong time to see the Buddha,
as he’s in retreat.
And it’s the wrong time to see the esteemed mendicants,
as they’re in retreat.
Why don’t I go to the monastery of the wanderers who follow other paths?”
Then he went to the monastery of the wanderers who follow other paths.
Now at that time, the wanderers who follow other paths had come together, making an uproar, a dreadful racket as they sat and talked about all kinds of unworthy topics.
They saw Anāthapiṇḍika coming off in the distance,
and stopped each other, saying,
“Be quiet, good sirs, don’t make a sound.
The householder Anāthapiṇḍika, a disciple of the ascetic Gotama, is coming into our monastery.
He is included among the white-clothed lay disciples of the ascetic Gotama, who is residing in Sāvatthī.
Such venerables like the quiet, are educated to be quiet, and praise the quiet.
Hopefully if he sees that our assembly is quiet he’ll see fit to approach.”
Then those wanderers who follow other paths fell silent.
Then Anāthapiṇḍika went up to them, and exchanged greetings with those wanderers.
When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side. The wanderers said to him,
“Tell us, householder, what is the view of the ascetic Gotama?”
“Sirs, I don’t know all his views.”
“Sirs, I don’t know all the mendicants’ views.”
“Well then, since it seems you don’t know all the views of the ascetic Gotama or of the mendicants,
tell us, householder, what is your view?”
“Sirs, it’s not hard for me to explain what my views are.
But please, let the venerables explain their own convictions first. Afterwards it won’t be hard for me to explain my views.”
When he said this, one of the wanderers said to him,
“The cosmos is eternal. This is the only truth, other ideas are silly.
That’s my view, householder.”
Another wanderer said,
“The cosmos is not eternal. This is the only truth, other ideas are silly.
That’s my view, householder.”
Another wanderer said,
“The world is finite …” …
“The world is infinite …” …
“The soul and the body are the same thing …” …
“The soul and the body are different things …” …
“A Realized One exists after death …” …
“A Realized One doesn’t exist after death …” …
“A Realized One both exists and doesn’t exist after death …” …
“A Realized One neither exists nor doesn’t exist after death. This is the only truth, other ideas are silly.
That’s my view, householder.”
When this was said, Anāthapiṇḍika said this,
“Sirs, regarding the venerable who said this:
‘The cosmos is eternal. This is the only truth, other ideas are silly.
That’s my view, householder.’
This view of his has either arisen from his own improper attention, or is conditioned by what someone else says.
But that view is created, conditioned, chosen, dependently originated.
Anything that is created, conditioned, chosen, and dependently originated is impermanent.
And what’s impermanent is suffering.
What he clings to and holds to is just suffering.
Regarding the venerable who said this:
‘The cosmos is not eternal. This is the only truth, other ideas are silly.
That’s my view, householder.’
This view of his has either arisen from his own improper attention, or is conditioned by what someone else says.
But that view is created, conditioned, chosen, dependently originated.
Anything that is created, conditioned, chosen, and dependently originated is impermanent.
And what’s impermanent is suffering.
What he clings to and holds to is just suffering.
Regarding the venerable who said this:
‘The world is finite …’ …
‘The world is infinite …’ …
‘The soul and the body are the same thing …’ …
‘The soul and the body are different things …’ …
‘A Realized One exists after death …’ …
‘A Realized One doesn’t exist after death …’ …
‘A Realized One both exists and doesn’t exist after death …’ …
‘A Realized One neither exists nor doesn’t exist after death. This is the only truth, other ideas are silly.
That’s my view, householder.’
This view of his has either arisen from his own improper attention, or is conditioned by what someone else says.
But that view is created, conditioned, chosen, dependently originated.
Anything that is created, conditioned, chosen, and dependently originated is impermanent.
And what’s impermanent is suffering.
What he clings to and holds to is just suffering.”
When he said this the wanderers said to him,
“Householder, we’ve each explained our own convictions.
Tell us, householder, what is your view?”
“Sirs, anything that is created, conditioned, chosen, and dependently originated is impermanent.
And what’s impermanent is suffering.
And what’s suffering is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.
That’s my view, sirs.”
“Householder, anything that is created, conditioned, chosen, and dependently originated is impermanent.
And what’s impermanent is suffering.
What you cling to and hold to is just suffering.”
“Sirs, anything that is created, conditioned, chosen, and dependently originated is impermanent.
And what’s impermanent is suffering.
And I’ve truly seen clearly with right wisdom that what’s suffering is not mine, I am not this, it’s not my self.
And I truly understand the escape beyond that.”
When this was said, those wanderers sat silent, dismayed, shoulders drooping, downcast, depressed, with nothing to say.
Seeing this, Anāthapiṇḍika got up from his seat. He went to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and informed the Buddha of all they had discussed.
“Good, good, householder!
That’s how you should legitimately and completely refute those foolish men from time to time.”
Then the Buddha educated, encouraged, fired up, and inspired the householder Anāthapiṇḍika with a Dhamma talk,
after which Anāthapiṇḍika got up from his seat, bowed, and respectfully circled the Buddha before leaving.
Then, not long after Anāthapiṇḍika had left, the Buddha addressed the mendicants:
“Mendicants, even a mendicant who has ordained for a hundred years in this teaching and training would legitimately and completely refute those wanderers who follow other paths just as the householder Anāthapiṇḍika did.”