buddha daily wisdom image

sn.12.32 Saṁyutta Nikāya (Linked Discourses)

The Kaḷara

At Savatthī.

i

Then the bhikkhu Kaḷara the Khattiya approached the Venerable Sāriputta and exchanged greetings with him. When they had concluded their greetings and cordial talk, he sat down to one side and said to the Venerable Sāriputta: “Friend Sāriputta, the bhikkhu Moḷiyaphagguna has abandoned the training and returned to the lower life.”

“Then surely that venerable did not find solace in this Dhamma and Discipline.”

“Well then, has the Venerable Sāriputta attained solace in this Dhamma and Discipline?”

“I have no perplexity, friend.”

“But as to the future, friend?”

“I have no doubt, friend.”

Then the bhikkhu Kaḷara the Khattiya rose from his seat and approached the Blessed One. Having approached, he paid homage to the Blessed One, sat down to one side, and said to him: “Venerable sir, the Venerable Sāriputta has declared final knowledge thus: ‘I understand: Destroyed is birth, the holy life has been lived, what had to be done has been done, there is no more for this state of being.’”

Then the Blessed One addressed a certain bhikkhu thus: “Come, bhikkhu, tell Sāriputta in my name that the Teacher calls him.”

“Yes, venerable sir,” that bhikkhu replied, and he went to the Venerable Sāriputta and told him: “The Teacher calls you, friend Sāriputta.”

“Yes, friend,” the Venerable Sāriputta replied, and he approached the Blessed One, paid homage to him, and sat down to one side. The Blessed One then said to him: “Is it true, Sāriputta, that you have declared final knowledge thus: ‘I understand: Destroyed is birth, the holy life has been lived, what had to be done has been done, there is no more for this state of being’?”

“Venerable sir, I did not state the matter in those terms and phrases.”

“In whatever way, Sāriputta, a clansman declares final knowledge, what he has declared should be understood as such.”

“Venerable sir, didn’t I too speak thus: ‘Venerable sir, I did not state the matter in those terms and phrases’?”

“If, Sāriputta, they were to ask you: ‘Friend Sāriputta, how have you known, how have you seen, that you have declared final knowledge thus: ‘I understand: Destroyed is birth, the holy life has been lived, what had to be done has been done, there is no more for this state of being’—being asked thus, how would you answer?”

“If they were to ask me this, venerable sir, I would answer thus: ‘With the destruction of the source from which birth originates, I have understood: “When the cause is destroyed, the effect is destroyed.” Having understood this, I understand: Destroyed is birth, the holy life has been lived, what had to be done has been done, there is no more for this state of being.’ Being asked thus, venerable sir, I would answer in such a way.”

“But, Sāriputta, if they were to ask you: ‘But, friend Sāriputta, what is the source of birth, what is its origin, from what is it born and produced?’—being asked thus, how would you answer?”

“If they were to ask me this, venerable sir, I would answer thus: ‘Birth, friends, has existence has its source, existence as its origin; it is born and produced from existence.’ Being asked thus, venerable sir, I would answer in such a way.”

“But, Sāriputta, if they were to ask you: ‘But, friend Sāriputta, what is the source of existence…?’—being asked thus, how would you answer?”

“If they were to ask me this, venerable sir, I would answer thus: ‘Existence, friends, has clinging as its source….’”

“But, Sāriputta, if they were to ask you: ‘But, friend Sāriputta, what is the source of clinging…? What is the source of craving, what is its origin, from what is it born and produced?’—being asked thus, how would you answer?”

“If they were to ask me this, venerable sir, I would answer thus: ‘Craving, friends, has feeling as its source, feeling as its origin; it is born and produced from feeling.’ Being asked thus, venerable sir, I would answer in such a way.”

“But, Sāriputta, if they were to ask you: ‘Friend Sāriputta, how have you known, how have you seen, that delight in feelings no longer remains present in you?’—being asked thus, how would you answer?”

“If they were to ask me this, venerable sir, I would answer thus: ‘Friends, there are these three feelings. What three? Pleasant feeling, painful feeling, neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling. These three feelings, friends, are impermanent; whatever is impermanent is suffering. When this was understood, delight in feelings no longer remained present in me.’ Being asked thus, venerable sir, I would answer in such a way.”

“Good, good, Sāriputta! This is another method of explaining in brief that same point: ‘Whatever is felt is included within suffering. ’ But, Sāriputta, if they were to ask you: ‘Friend Sāriputta, through what kind of deliverance have you declared final knowledge thus: “I understand: Destroyed is birth, the holy life has been lived, what had to be done has been done, there is no more for this state of being”?’—being asked thus, how would you answer?”

“If they were to ask me this, venerable sir, I would answer thus: ‘Friends, through an internal deliverance, through the destruction of all clinging, I dwell mindfully in such a way that the taints do not flow within me and I do not despise myself.’ Being asked thus, venerable sir, I would answer in such a way.”

“Good, good, Sāriputta! This is another method of explaining in brief that same point: ‘I have no perplexity in regard to the taints spoken of by the Ascetic; I do not doubt that they have been abandoned by me.’”

This is what the Blessed One said. Having said this, the Fortunate One rose from his seat and entered his dwelling.

ii

Then, soon after the Blessed One had departed, the Venerable Sāriputta addressed the bhikkhus thus:

“Friends, the first question that the Blessed One asked me had not been previously considered by me: thus I hesitated over it. But when the Blessed One approved of my answer, it occurred to me: ‘If the Blessed One were to question me about this matter with various terms and with various methods for a whole day, for a whole day I would be able to answer him with various terms and with various methods. If he were to question me about this matter with various terms and with various methods for a whole night, for a day and night, for two days and nights, for three, four, five, six, or seven days and nights—for seven days and nights I would be able to answer him with various terms and with various methods.’”

Then the bhikkhu Kaḷara the Khattiya rose from his seat and approached the Blessed One. Having approached, he paid homage to the Blessed One, sat down to one side, and said to him: “Venerable sir, the Venerable Sāriputta has roared his lion’s roar thus: ‘Friends, the first question that the Blessed One asked me had not been previously considered by me: thus I hesitated over it. But when the Blessed One approved of my answer, it occurred to me: “If the Blessed One were to question me about this matter for up to seven days and nights, for up to seven days and nights I would be able to answer him with various terms and with various methods.”’”

“Bhikkhu, the Venerable Sāriputta has thoroughly penetrated that element of the Dhamma by the thorough penetration of which, if I were to question him about that matter with various terms and with various methods for up to seven days and nights, for up to seven days and nights he would be able to answer me with various terms and with various methods.”

- Translator: Bhikkhu Bodhi

- Editor: Blake Walsh


With Kaḷāra the Aristocrat

At Sāvatthī.
Then the mendicant Kaḷāra the Aristocrat went up to Venerable Sāriputta and exchanged greetings with him.
When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side and said to him,
“Reverend Sāriputta, the mendicant Phagguna of the Top-Knot has resigned the training and returned to a lesser life.”
“That venerable mustn’t have got any satisfaction in this teaching and training.”
“Well then, has Venerable Sāriputta found satisfaction in this teaching and training?”
“Reverend, I have no uncertainty.”
“But what of the future?”
“I have no doubt.”
Then Kaḷāra the Aristocrat went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him,
“Sir, Venerable Sāriputta has declared enlightenment:
‘I understand: “Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is no return to any state of existence.”’”
So the Buddha addressed a certain monk,
“Please, monk, in my name tell Sāriputta that
the teacher summons him.”
“Yes, sir,” that monk replied. He went to Sāriputta and said to him,
“Reverend Sāriputta, the teacher summons you.”
“Yes, reverend,” replied Sāriputta. He went to the Buddha, bowed, and sat down to one side. The Buddha said to him,
“Sāriputta, is it really true that you have declared enlightenment:
‘I understand: “Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is no return to any state of existence”’?”
“Sir, I did not state the matter in these words and phrases.”
“Sāriputta, no matter how a gentleman declares enlightenment, what he has declared should be regarded as such.”
“Sir, did I not also say that
I did not state the matter in these words and phrases?”
“Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you:
‘But Reverend Sāriputta, how have you known and seen so that you’ve declared enlightenment:
“I understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is no return to any state of existence.’”’
How would you answer?”
“Sir, if they were to ask me this,


I would answer:
‘Reverends, because of the ending of the source of rebirth, when it ended, I knew “it is ended”.
Knowing this,
I understand: “Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is no return to any state of existence.”’
That’s how I’d answer such a question.”
“But Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you:
‘But what is the source, origin, birthplace, and inception of rebirth?’
How would you answer?”
“Sir, if they were to ask me this,

I would answer:
‘Continued existence is the source, origin, birthplace, and inception of rebirth.’
That’s how I’d answer such a question.”
“But Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you:
‘What is the source of continued existence?’
How would you answer?”
“Sir, if they were to ask me this,

I’d answer:
‘Grasping is the source of continued existence.’
That’s how I’d answer such a question.”
“But Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you:
‘What is the source of grasping?’ …
But Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you:
‘What is the source of craving?’
How would you answer?”
“Sir, if they were to ask me this,

I’d answer:
‘Feeling is the source of craving.’
That’s how I’d answer such a question.”
“But Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you:
‘But how have you known and seen so that the relishing of feelings is no longer present?’
How would you answer?”
“Sir, if they were to ask me this,
I’d answer:
‘Reverends, there are three feelings.
What three?
Pleasant, painful, and neutral feeling.
These three feelings are impermanent,
and what’s impermanent is suffering.
When I understood this, the relishing of feelings was no longer present.’
That’s how I’d answer such a question.”
“Good, good, Sāriputta!
The same point may also be briefly explained in this way:
‘Suffering includes whatever is felt.’
But Sāriputta, suppose they were to ask you:
‘But Reverend, how have you been released that you declare enlightenment:
“I understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is no return to any state of existence.’”?’
How would you answer?”
“Sir, if they were to ask me this,


I’d answer:
‘Because of an inner release with the ending of all grasping, I live mindfully so that defilements don’t defile me and I don’t look down on myself.’
That’s how I’d answer such a question.”
“Good, good, Sāriputta!
The same point may also be briefly explained in this way:
‘I have no uncertainty regarding the defilements spoken of by the ascetic. I have no doubt that I’ve given them up.’”
That is what the Buddha said.
When he had spoken, the Holy One got up from his seat and entered his dwelling.
Then soon after the Buddha left, Venerable Sāriputta said to the mendicants,
“Reverends, the first question that the Buddha asked me was something that I’d not previously considered, so I hesitated.
But when the Buddha agreed with my answer, I thought:
‘If the Buddha were to question me all day on this matter in different words and ways, I could answer all day with different words and ways.
If he were to question me all night,
all day and night,
for two days and nights,

for three,

four,

five,

six,

or seven days and nights, I could answer in different words and ways for seven days and nights.’”
Then Kaḷāra the Aristocrat went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him,
“Sir, Venerable Sāriputta has roared his lion’s roar!”
(And he told the Buddha all that Sāriputta had said.)










“Mendicant, Sāriputta has clearly comprehended the principle of the teachings, so that he could answer any questions I might ask him in different words and ways up to the seventh day and night.”